Privatization Knowledge Base
privatization? what are the pros and cons of privatization and what would it do to tax payers?
Privatization?? Alot of talk of the "BENIFITS" of privatizing aspects of government(social security)-Why no mention of privitizing the MILITARY????
What is the privatization of probation and parole services? What are three arguments in support of Privatization What are three arguments in opposition to Privatization What is the privatization of probation and parole services? Another ethical issue is whether states should privatize probation and parole services or continue to keep them public. Proponents of privatization argue that there are several benefits of turning over various governmental services to private corporations. One alleged benefit is the reduction of operating costs. Proponents claim that private enterprise can do things more efficiently and less expensively than the government. Government operation is equated with waste and inefficiency. Some of this is attributed to the civil service system, which guarantees job tenure except in extreme circumstances when jobs are abolished. Civil service workers are not under the same pressures as workers in private industry, who must consistently show a profit. Opponents of privatization argue that government agencies can be efficient and effective. According to this perspective, government offices can adopt efficiency and effectiveness enhancing strategies just as do privately run agencies. Perhaps the main argument against privatization is whether it is appropriate for the government to turn over functions as basic as the correctional supervision of offenders to private businesses. Many question whether the symbolic task of punishing offenders should be handed over to workers who wear uniforms that say “Brand X Corrections” rather than the “State of ___” (American Bar Association, 1986). the most dramatic example of this would be for render the symbolism of the state executing an offender? Less dramatically, is it right for the state to contract out prison operations that involve the deprivation of liberty and serious disciplinary measures such as solitary confinement? Set against this context, is it ethical to allow a private company to operate a probation or parole operation that involves the very important decision of whether to allow an offender to remain in the community or be revoked for a violation and sent to prison? Or does the deprivation of liberty involve a basic right that ought not to be relinquished by the government? Another concern with regard to privatization is whether the profit motive can debase corrections. For example, would private probation or parole agencies be under pressure to keep clients under supervision beyond an appropriate release time so as to keep caseloads and reimbursements high? Would private agencies try to pay their employees fair salaries, or would profit pressures work to minimize salaries and benefits for officers? Would private agencies try to cut services for offender (e.g., counseling, drug treatment) to a minimum? In the 19 century, the profit motive did operate to cause significant problems in many state prison systems. In one juvenile system, for example, boys would be kept under supervision longer than necessary because the contractor did not want to lose their productivity. A more recent example of the profit movitve perhaps having a negative effect occurred in Texas in 1997. Guards in a Texas jail were videotaped apparently shooting offenders with stun guns, kicking offenders in the groin, allowing dogs to bite the offenders, and making offenders crawl on their hands and knees. These guards were Texas jailers supervising Missouri offenders who had been sent to excess jail space in Texas because of over crowding in Missouri-at a charge of $40 per day per offender to the state of Missouri. This situation is sort of an in-between area between public and private enterprise, in which one state offers a service to another state for a profit. Arguably, the profit motive influenced Texas officials to be lax in their training and or supervision to the extent that this brutality occurred. One response to such problems is spelling out a private agency's responsibilities to offenders in a carefully devised contract and then monitoring the implementation of the contract. If state inspectors enforce the contract conditions, then problems can be prevented or quickly resolved. If a private agency does not resolve any problems, they are in violation of the contract and the agency can be dropped. Opponents of privatization argue that there is a problem with this argument. If the state wants to end a contract, there may not be another service provider willing and able to step in and take over the contracted service. At the very least, it would take some time for another company to be ready to provide the needed service. Still another problem with privatization is not private agencies can be overly selective of the clients they want to manage. Private agencies in corrections and in areas such as welfare have been criticized for picking the most capable clients. The criticism is that these individuals may have been able to succeed on probation or in getting off of public assistance with little or no h
What if the Republican Health Care solution was mandated privatization? How loud would the liberals howl? Could you imagine the scorn, ridicule and rage from the left, if Republicans even propose such a "privatized" solution to health care? Forcing the uninsured to purchase private insurance policies from FOR PROFIT corporations, or face the IRS? Is this like when Bush makes the Patriot act - liberals howl, but when Obama strengthens it, they cheer? I just don't get why liberals are embracing the mandated privatization of for profit health care What's next, the privatization of Social Security ?
What good can come from water privatization? I have been researching water privatization and I have found enough reasons to why privatization is a terrible idea (high costs, sub-par water conditions and lack of say from the community) but to be completely unbiased in understanding the situation I need some reasons of how privatization can possibly be positive for a community. Thanks for the answers!
Trying to understand Privatization in the government? What exactly is privatization in the government I have to read two articles, the fox in the henhouse and downsizing the federal government, and do not understand what they're trying to stay or what exactly privatization is. HElp!
Do you think the privatization is a good option for you and the economy as a whole? Considering the state of social security and the growing challenges faced by the federal government, Do you think the privatization is a good option for you and the economy as a whole? How will privatization of social security positively effect your personal finances and the economy in a large extent? How can we solve the insolvency of social security.
What do you think of the planned privatization of prisons in Arizona? The state of Arizona has plans to lease 9 out of 10 of its prisons to private companies. How do you feel about the privatization of an area that was once under public control? Do you feel like the potential for the prison system to be abused for profit is too large? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/us/24prison.html
Conservatives/libertarians - are you sure privatization of Social Security is the free market approach? It seems to me that if privatization - generally sold as a free market alternative to the existing system - would have passed, there would be intense pressure on government to reflate asset prices and/or compensate people who've "lost" lots of money. If memory serves, I think I read a libertarian perspective agreeing with this conclusion on the Mises Institute site a while back. However, I think it's still very much a minority position amongst libertarians and conservatives - could one of you enlighten me?
What is so bad about privatization of social security? I havbe heard it explained what it is and I don't see the problem with it. I like wuxxler's answer, especially the animal farm referance. The way social security is now wouldn't young people lose the most because of how people are living longer and so the can live for 20-30 years after they retire, meaning they live off the system for that long and allow less money for younger generations. Actually I am of the belief thewre there are no safe stocks yet I still think there is something else you can do if social security were privatized.
What do you think of Social Security privatization? I disagree with the current federal administration on almost all issues except liberal gun rights. I gave the idea of privatization of Social Security as proposed by our president on creating accounts for young American citizens to invest in over three or more decades of active working life a serious thought. If one is financially independent by the virtue of pride, perseverance and hard work and have a big nest egg in retirement savings, obviously that person doesn't need to receive a pension. On the other hand, the majority of the people who have worked in active labor for three to five or six decades can always opt to receive the pension upon mandated age of retirement or verified disability to alleviate economic hardship. If laissez-faire economic policy (w/o govt intervention except stock fraud & abuse) apply w/ the new elective admin, should SS be done away with in gradual dissolution to reduce govt size or stay preserved, whole or partial with private investment account? To make my political view clear, I'm a registered Libertarian (green libertarian) and former Independent. I cast vote on any candidate of diverse political affiliations based on the appeal of honest campaign and character promoting progressive changes while striving to reduce government size. I'm a Jeffersonian type.
Considering the current state of the economy is privatization of Social Security a good idea? How many would be invested in companies like Bear Sterns...or Carlyle or even Blackstone (all losing lots of money right now and BS sold for a measly 2.00 a share) ? If you are a supporter of privatization does the current state of the ecomony give you pause for concern? That should be "partial privatization"..oops. The largest slice of the Federal budget goes to Social Security, that's not including medicare and the new prescription drug plan.
For privatization programs to succeed, it is essential to? 1. declare the old state-owned enterprises bankrupt. 2. eliminate externalities in the industrial sector. 3. use tariffs to protect the enterprises from import competition. 4. cut the ties that bind the enterprises to the government bureaucracy.
Doesn't privatization of Government assets divert capital from necessary innovation? With climate change we have to invent a vastly different economy, with new technologies for most things from transport to housing. In Australia now, Government agreements with Tollway operators are now preventing the development of competing alternative road systems and public transport systems - and there are plenty of similar situations globally from tollways to fossil fuel power generation, communications systems, water, etc. Most contracts even guarantee private interests very high returns, with penalties at public cost. Isn't it time we took back responsibility and authority for the community utilities past generations created?
Is the bailout of Fannie & Freddie proof privatization fails? Up until 1968, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were government-run and healthy. However, in 1968, both mortage lenders were privatized. Today, however, under private ownership, both lenders have collapsed, but will now, by an extraordinary decision by Treasury, be propped-up using untold billions of taxpayer-dollars. The private shareholders will therefore be bailed-out as if their investments never under any risk. Is this further proof that privatizing government-run financial enterprises simply creates a dis-incentive for the private owners to run these operations responsibly?
What are three arguments in support of Privatization/What are three arguments in opposition to Privatization? What are three arguments in support of Privatization What are three arguments in opposition to Privatization What is the privatization of probation and parole services? What are three arguments in support of Privatization What are three arguments in opposition to Privatization What is the privatization of probation and parole services? Another ethical issue is whether states should privatize probation and parole services or continue to keep them public. Proponents of privatization argue that there are several benefits of turning over various governmental services to private corporations. One alleged benefit is the reduction of operating costs. Proponents claim that private enterprise can do things more efficiently and less expensively than the government. Government operation is equated with waste and inefficiency. Some of this is attributed to the civil service system, which guarantees job tenure except in extreme circumstances when jobs are abolished. Civil service workers are not under the same pressures as workers in private industry, who must consistently show a profit. Opponents of privatization argue that government agencies can be efficient and effective. According to this perspective, government offices can adopt efficiency and effectiveness enhancing strategies just as do privately run agencies. Perhaps the main argument against privatization is whether it is appropriate for the government to turn over functions as basic as the correctional supervision of offenders to private businesses. Many question whether the symbolic task of punishing offenders should be handed over to workers who wear uniforms that say “Brand X Corrections” rather than the “State of ___” (American Bar Association, 1986). the most dramatic example of this would be for render the symbolism of the state executing an offender? Less dramatically, is it right for the state to contract out prison operations that involve the deprivation of liberty and serious disciplinary measures such as solitary confinement? Set against this context, is it ethical to allow a private company to operate a probation or parole operation that involves the very important decision of whether to allow an offender to remain in the community or be revoked for a violation and sent to prison? Or does the deprivation of liberty involve a basic right that ought not to be relinquished by the government? Another concern with regard to privatization is whether the profit motive can debase corrections. For example, would private probation or parole agencies be under pressure to keep clients under supervision beyond an appropriate release time so as to keep caseloads and reimbursements high? Would private agencies try to pay their employees fair salaries, or would profit pressures work to minimize salaries and benefits for officers? Would private agencies try to cut services for offender (e.g., counseling, drug treatment) to a minimum? In the 19 century, the profit motive did operate to cause significant problems in many state prison systems. In one juvenile system, for example, boys would be kept under supervision longer than necessary because the contractor did not want to lose their productivity. A more recent example of the profit movitve perhaps having a negative effect occurred in Texas in 1997. Guards in a Texas jail were videotaped apparently shooting offenders with stun guns, kicking offenders in the groin, allowing dogs to bite the offenders, and making offenders crawl on their hands and knees. These guards were Texas jailers supervising Missouri offenders who had been sent to excess jail space in Texas because of over crowding in Missouri-at a charge of $40 per day per offender to the state of Missouri. This situation is sort of an in-between area between public and private enterprise, in which one state offers a service to another state for a profit. Arguably, the profit motive influenced Texas officials to be lax in their training and or supervision to the extent that this brutality occurred. One response to such problems is spelling out a private agency's responsibilities to offenders in a carefully devised contract and then monitoring the implementation of the contract. If state inspectors enforce the contract conditions, then problems can be prevented or quickly resolved. If a private agency does not resolve any problems, they are in violation of the contract and the agency can be dropped. Opponents of privatization argue that there is a problem with this argument. If the state wants to end a contract, there may not be another service provider willing and able to step in and take over the contracted service. At the very least, it would take some time for another company to be ready to provide the needed service. Still another problem with privatization is not private agencies can be overly selective of the clients they want to manage. Private agencies in corrections and in areas such as welfare have been criticized for p
How many would support complete privatization of the military? They get better pay, better benefits, they have real medical insurance and if they get blown up the get real medical care instead of shafted with broken VA. They can have contracts around the world but in times of real necessity contracts are cancelled and they fight the war. I think this is vastly superior in all the ways mentioned but also they get ongoing training in real conflicts. Just a thought please post yours!!
Explain why the Government is so bad? people who support privatization? Isnt the govt just the people? of the people? elected to organize the group efficiently? Letting private profit hungry corps have control of everything creates the people themselves being abused. Isnt the govt the counterbalance for the elite abusing the people. Isnt the elite vs. the people the struggle of all nations of history? In privatization with little government, how do we police them?
Would privatization of national defense be a good idea? Hand over the military to a corporation with stockholders and watch it become streamlined, efficient, and profitable! No more taxes going to defending Iraq! And remember, Republicans are in favor of privatizing everything else, so please... no double-standards, ok?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers